While it is true that power systems are designed to be transiently stable, and many of the methods described above may be used to achieve this goal, in actual practice, systems may be prone to instability.
This is largely due to uncertainties related to assumptions made during the design process. These uncertainties result from a number of sources, including:
• LOAD AND GENERATION FORECAST: The design process must use forecast information about the amount, distribution, and characteristics of the connected loads, as well as the location and amount of connected generation. These all have a great deal of uncertainty. If the actual system load is higher than planned, the generation output will be higher, the system will be more stressed, and the transient stability limit may be significantly lower.
• SYSTEM TOPOLOGY: Design studies generally assume all elements in service, or perhaps up to two elements out of service. In actual systems, there are usually many elements out of service at any one time due to forced outages (failures) or system maintenance. Clearly, these outages can seriously weaken the system and make it less transiently stable.
• DYNAMIC MODELING: All models used for power system simulation, even the most advanced, contain approximations out of practical necessity.
• DYNAMIC DATA: The results of time-domain simulations depend heavily on the data used to represent the models for generators and the associated controls. In many cases this data is not known (typical data is assumed) or is in error (either because it has not been derived from field measurements or due to changes that have been made in the actual system controls that have not been reflected in the data).
• DEVICE OPERATION: In the design process it is assumed that controls and protection will operate as designed. In the actual system, relays, breakers, and other controls may fail or operate improperly.
To deal with these uncertainties in actual system operation, safety margins are used. Operational (short term) time-domain simulations are conducted using a system model that is more accurate (by accounting for elements out on maintenance, improved short-term load forecast, etc.) than the design model. Transient stability limits are computed using these models. The limits are generally in terms of maximum flows allowable over critical interfaces, or maximum generation output allowable from critical generating sources. Safety margins are then applied to these computed limits. This means that actual system operation is restricted to levels (interface flows or generation) below the stability limit by an amount equal to a defined safety margin.
In general, the margin is expressed in terms of a percentage of the critical flow or generation output. For example, operation procedure might be to define the operating limit as 10% below the stability limit.
This is largely due to uncertainties related to assumptions made during the design process. These uncertainties result from a number of sources, including:
• LOAD AND GENERATION FORECAST: The design process must use forecast information about the amount, distribution, and characteristics of the connected loads, as well as the location and amount of connected generation. These all have a great deal of uncertainty. If the actual system load is higher than planned, the generation output will be higher, the system will be more stressed, and the transient stability limit may be significantly lower.
• SYSTEM TOPOLOGY: Design studies generally assume all elements in service, or perhaps up to two elements out of service. In actual systems, there are usually many elements out of service at any one time due to forced outages (failures) or system maintenance. Clearly, these outages can seriously weaken the system and make it less transiently stable.
• DYNAMIC MODELING: All models used for power system simulation, even the most advanced, contain approximations out of practical necessity.
• DYNAMIC DATA: The results of time-domain simulations depend heavily on the data used to represent the models for generators and the associated controls. In many cases this data is not known (typical data is assumed) or is in error (either because it has not been derived from field measurements or due to changes that have been made in the actual system controls that have not been reflected in the data).
• DEVICE OPERATION: In the design process it is assumed that controls and protection will operate as designed. In the actual system, relays, breakers, and other controls may fail or operate improperly.
To deal with these uncertainties in actual system operation, safety margins are used. Operational (short term) time-domain simulations are conducted using a system model that is more accurate (by accounting for elements out on maintenance, improved short-term load forecast, etc.) than the design model. Transient stability limits are computed using these models. The limits are generally in terms of maximum flows allowable over critical interfaces, or maximum generation output allowable from critical generating sources. Safety margins are then applied to these computed limits. This means that actual system operation is restricted to levels (interface flows or generation) below the stability limit by an amount equal to a defined safety margin.
In general, the margin is expressed in terms of a percentage of the critical flow or generation output. For example, operation procedure might be to define the operating limit as 10% below the stability limit.
Comments