Monday, June 30, 2014

Engr. Aneel Kumar

FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN CONTROL AND PROTECTION

Existing protection/control systems may be improved and new protection/control systems may be developed to better adapt to prevailing system conditions during system-wide disturbance. While improvements in the existing systems are mostly achieved through advancement in local measurements and development of better algorithms, improvements in new systems are based on remote communications.

However, even if communication links exist, conventional systems that utilize only local information may still need improvement since they are supposed to serve as fallback positions. The increased functions and communication ability in today’s SCADA systems provide the opportunity for an intelligent and adaptive control and protection system for system-wide disturbance. This, in turn, can make possible full utilization of the network, which will be less vulnerable to a major disturbance.
Out-of-step relays have to be fast and reliable. The present technology of out-of-step tripping or blocking distance relays is not capable of fully dealing with the control and protection requirements of power systems. Central to the development effort of an out-of-step protection system is the investigation of the multi-area out-of-step situation. The new generation of out-of-step relays has to utilize more measurements, both local and remote, and has to produce more outputs. The structure of the overall relaying system has to be distributed and coordinated through a central control. In order for the relaying system to manage complexity, most of the decisions have to be made locally. Preferably, the relay system is adaptive, in order to cope with system changes. To deal with out-of-step prediction, it is necessary to start with a system-wide approach, find out what sets of information are crucial and how to the process information with acceptable speed and accuracy.

Protection against voltage instability should also be addressed as a part of hierarchical structure. The sound approach for designing the new generation of voltage instability protection is to first design a voltage instability relay with only local signals. The limitations of local signals should be identified in order to be in a position to select appropriate communicated signals. However, a minimum set of communicated signals should always be known in order to design reliable protection, which requires the following: (a) determining the algorithm for gradual reduction of the number of necessary measurement sites with minimum loss of information necessary for voltage stability monitoring, analysis, and control; (b) development of methods (i.e., sensitivity analysis), which should operate concurrent with any existing local protection techniques, and possessing superior performance, both in terms of security and dependability.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SPECIAL PROTECTION SCHEMES

Increasingly popular over the past several years are the so-called special protection systems, sometimes also referred to as remedial action schemes.

Depending on the power system in question, it is sometimes possible to identify the contingencies or combinations of operating conditions that may lead to transients with extremely disastrous consequences. Such problems include, but are not limited to, transmission line faults, the outages of lines and possible cascading that such an initial contingency may cause, outages of the generators, rapid changes of the load level, problems with HVDC or FACTS equipment, or any combination of those events.

Among the many varieties of special protection schemes, several names have been used to describe the general category: special stability controls, dynamic security controls, contingency arming schemes, remedial action schemes, adaptive protection schemes, corrective action schemes, security enhancement schemes, etc. In the strict sense of protective relaying, we do not consider any control schemes to be SPS, but only those protective relaying systems that possess the following properties:

• SPS can be operational (“armed”), or out of service (“disarmed”), in conjunction with the system conditions.

• SPS are responding to very low probability events; hence they are active rarely more than once a year.

• SPS operate on simple, predetermined control laws, often calculated based on extensive offline studies.

• Oftentimes, SPS involve communication of remotely acquired measurement data (SCADA) from more than one location in order to make a decision and invoke a control law.

The SPS design procedure is based on the following:

• IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL CONDITIONS: On the grounds of extensive offline steady state studies on the system under consideration, a variety of operating conditions and contingencies are identified as potentially dangerous, and those among them that are deemed the most harmful are recognized as the critical conditions. The issue of their continuous monitoring, detection, and mitigation is resolved through offline studies.

• RECOGNITION TRIGGERS: These are the measurable signals that can be used for detection of critical conditions. Oftentimes, such detection is accomplished through a complicated heuristic logical reasoning, using the logic circuits to accomplish the task: “If event A and event B occur together, or event C occurs, then…” Inputs for the decision making logic are called recognition triggers, and can be the status of various relays in the system, sometimes combined with a number of (SCADA) measurements.

• OPERATOR CONTROL: In spite of extensive simulations and studies done in the process of SPS design, it is often necessary to include human intervention, i.e., to include human interaction in the feedback loop. This is necessary because SPS are not needed all the time, and the decision to arm, or disarm them remains in the hands of an operator.

Among the SPS schemes reported in the literature, the following are represented:

• Generator Rejection
• Load Rejection
• Under frequency Load Shedding
• System Separation
• Turbine Valve Control
• Stabilizers
• HVDC Controls
• Out-of-step Relaying
• Dynamic Braking
• Generator Runback
• VAR Compensation
• Combination of schemes

Some of them have already been described in the above text. A general trend continues toward more complex schemes, capable of outperforming the present solutions and taking advantage of the most recent technological developments and advances in systems analysis.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

VOLTAGE STABILITY AND UNDERVOLTAGE LOAD SHEDDING

Voltage stability is defined by the System Dynamic Performance Subcommittee of the IEEE Power System Engineering Committee as being the ability of a system to maintain voltage such that when load admittance is increased, load power will increase, and so that both power and voltage are controllable. Also, voltage collapse is defined as being the process by which voltage instability leads to a very low voltage profile in a significant part of the system. It is accepted that this instability is caused by the load characteristics, as opposed to the angular instability that is caused by the rotor dynamics of generators.

The risk of voltage instability increases as the transmission system becomes more heavily loaded. The typical scenario of these instabilities starts with a high system loading, followed by a relay action due to either a fault, a line overload, or hitting an excitation limit.

Voltage instability can be alleviated by a combination of the following remedial measures: adding reactive compensation near load centers, strengthening the transmission lines, varying the operating conditions such as voltage profile and generation dispatch, coordinating relays and controls, and load shedding. Most utilities rely on planning and operation studies to guard against voltage instability. Many utilities utilize localized voltage measurements in order to achieve load shedding as a measure against incipient voltage instability. The efficiency of the load shedding depends on the selected voltage thresholds, locations of pilot points in which the voltages are monitored, locations and sizes of the blocks of load to be shed, as well as the operating conditions that may activate the shedding. The wide variety of conditions that may lead to voltage instability suggests that the most accurate decisions should imply the adaptive relay settings, but such applications are still in the stage of early development.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

OVERLOAD AND UNDERFREQUENCY LOAD SHEDDING

Outage of one or more power system components due to the overload may result in overload of other elements in the system. If the overload is not alleviated in time, the process of power system cascading may start, leading to power system separation. When a power system separates, islands with an imbalance between generation and load are formed. One consequence of the imbalance is deviation of frequency from the nominal value. If the generators cannot handle the imbalance, load or generation shedding is necessary. A special protection system or out-of-step relaying can also start the separation.

A quick, simple, and reliable way to reestablish active power balance is to shed load by under-frequency relays. The load shedding is often designed as a multistep action, and the frequency settings and blocks of load to be shed are carefully selected to maximize the reliability and dependability of the action. There are a large variety of practices in designing load shedding schemes based on the characteristics of a particular system and the utility practices. While the system frequency is a final result of the power deficiency, the rate of change of frequency is an instantaneous indicator of power deficiency and can enable incipient recognition of the power imbalance. However, change of the machine speed is oscillatory by nature due to the interaction among generators. These oscillations depend on location of the sensors in the island and the response of the generators. The problems regarding the rate-of-change of frequency function are:

• Systems having small inertia may cause larger oscillations. Thus, enough time must be allowed for the relay to calculate the actual rate-of-change of frequency reliably. Measurements at load buses close to the electrical center of the system are less susceptible to oscillations (smaller peak-to- peak values) and can be used in practical applications. Smaller system inertia causes a higher frequency of oscillations, which enables faster calculation of the actual rate-of-change of frequency. However, it causes faster rate-of-change of frequency, and, consequently, a larger frequency drop.

• Even if rate-of-change of frequency relays measure the average value throughout the network, it is difficult to set them properly unless typical system boundaries and imbalance can be predicted. If this is the case (e.g., industrial and urban systems), the rate of change of frequency relays may improve a load shedding scheme (scheme can be more selective and/or faster).
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

TRANSIENT STABILITY AND OUT-OF-STEP PROTECTION

Every time a fault or a topological change affects the power balance in the system, the instantaneous power imbalance creates oscillations between the machines. Stable oscillations lead to transition from one (pre-fault) to another (post-fault) equilibrium point, whereas unstable ones allow machines to oscillate beyond the acceptable range. If the oscillations are large, the stations’ auxiliary supplies may undergo severe voltage fluctuations, and eventually trip. Should that happen, the subsequent resynchronization of the machines might take a long time. It is, therefore, desirable to trip the machine(s) exposed to transient unstable oscillations while the plant auxiliaries remain energized.

The frequency of the transient oscillations is usually between 0.5 and 2 Hz. Since the fault imposes almost instantaneous changes on the system, the slow speed of the transient disturbances can be used to distinguish between the two. For the sake of illustration, let us assume that a power system consists of two machines, A and B, connected by a transmission line. Figure 9.34 represents the trajectories of the stable and unstable swings between the machines, as well as a characteristic of the mho relay covering the line between them, shown in the impedance plane. The stable swing moves from the distant stable operating point towards the trip zone of the relay, and may even encroach on it, then leave again. The unstable trajectory may pass through the entire trip zone of the relay. The relaying tasks are to detect, and then trip (or block) the relay, depending on the situation. Detection is accomplished by out-of-step relays, which have multiple characteristics. When the trajectory of the impedance seen by the relays enters the outer zone (a circle with a larger radius), the timer is activated, and depending on the speed at which the impedance trajectory moves into the inner zone (a circle with a smaller radius), or leaves the outer zone, a tripping (or blocking) decision can be made. The relay characteristic may be chosen to be straight lines, known as “blinders,” which prevent the heavy load from being misrepresented as a fault or instability. Another piece of information that can be used in detection of transient swings is that they are symmetrical, and do not create any zero or negative sequence currents.

FIGURE 9.34 Trajectories of stable and unstable swings in the impedance plane.
In the case when power system separation is imminent, out-of-step protection should take place along boundaries that will form islands with matching load and generation. Distance relays are often used to provide an out-of-step protection function, whereby they are called upon to provide blocking or tripping signals upon detecting an out-of-step condition. The most common predictive scheme to combat loss of synchronism is the Equal-Area Criterion and its variations. This method assumes that the power system behaves like a two-machine model where one area oscillates against the rest of the system. Whenever the underlying assumption holds true, the method has potential for fast detection.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

PILOT PROTECTION

As can be seen from Fig. 9.33, step distance protection does not offer instantaneous clearing of faults over 100% of the line segment. In most cases this is unacceptable due to system stability considerations.

To cover the 10–20% of the line not covered by Zone 1, the information regarding the location of the fault is transmitted from each terminal to the other terminal(s). A communication channel is used for this transmission. These pilot channels can be over power line carrier, microwave, fiber-optic, or wire pilot. Although the underlying principles are the same regardless of the pilot channel, there are specific design details that are imposed by this choice.

Power line carrier uses the protected line itself as the channel, superimposing a high frequency signal on top of the 60 Hz power frequency. Since the line being protected is also the medium used to actuate the protective devices, a blocking signal is used. This means that a trip will occur at both ends of the line unless a signal is received from the remote end.

FIGURE 9.33 Three-zone step distance relaying to protect 100% of a line and backup the neighboring line.

Microwave or fiber-optic channels are independent of the transmission line being protected so a tripping signal can be used.

Wire pilot channels are limited by the impedance of the copper wire and are used at lower voltages where the distance between the terminals is not great, usually less than 10 miles.

DIRECTIONAL COMPARISON

The most common pilot relaying scheme in the U.S. is the directional comparison blocking scheme, using power line carrier. The fundamental principle upon which this scheme is based utilizes the fact that, at a given terminal, the direction of a fault either forward or backward is easily determined by a directional relay. By transmitting this information to the remote end, and by applying appropriate logic, both ends can determine whether a fault is within the protected line or external to it. Since the power line itself is used as the communication medium, a blocking signal is used.

TRANSFER TRIPPING

If the communication channel is independent of the power line, a tripping scheme is a viable protection scheme. Using the same directional relay logic to determine the location of a fault, a tripping signal is sent to the remote end. To increase security, there are several variations possible. A direct tripping signal can be sent, or additional under-reaching or overreaching directional relays can be used to supervise the tripping function and increase security. An under-reaching relay sees less than 100% of the protected line, i.e., Zone 1. An overreaching relay sees beyond the protected line such as Zone 2 or 3.

PHASE COMPARISON

Phase comparison is a differential scheme that compares the phase angle between the currents at the ends of the line. If the currents are essentially in phase, there is no fault in the protected section. If these currents are essentially 180o out of phase, there is a fault within the line section. Any communication link can be used.

PILOT WIRE

Pilot wire relaying is a form of differential line protection similar to phase comparison, except that the phase currents are compared over a pair of metallic wires. The pilot channel is often a rented circuit from the local telephone company. However, as the telephone companies are replacing their wired facilities with microwave or fiber-optics, this protection must be closely monitored.
Read More

Monday, June 09, 2014

Engr. Aneel Kumar

THE NATURE OF RELAYING

A) RELIABILITY

Reliability, in system protection parlance, has special definitions which differ from the usual planning or operating usage. A relay can miss-operate in two ways: it can fail to operate when it is required to do so, or it can operate when it is not required or desirable for it to do so. To cover both situations, there are two components in defining reliability:

DEPENDABILITY: This refers to the certainty that a relay will respond correctly for all faults for which it is designed and applied to operate; and

SECURITY: This is the measure that a relay will not operate incorrectly for any fault.

Most relays and relay schemes are designed to be dependable since the system itself is robust enough to withstand an incorrect trip-out (loss of security), whereas a failure to trip (loss of dependability) may be catastrophic in terms of system performance.

B) ZONES OF PROTECTION

The property of security is defined in terms of regions of a power system, called zones of protection, for which a given relay or protective system is responsible. The relay will be considered secure if it responds only to faults within its zone of protection. Figure 9.26 shows typical zones of protection with transmission lines, buses, and transformers, each residing in its own zone. Also shown are “closed zones” in which all power apparatus entering the zone is monitored, and “open” zones, the limit of which varies with the fault current. Closed zones are also known as “differential,” “unit,” or absolutely selective,” and open zones are “non-unit,” “unrestricted,” or “relatively selective.”

FIGURE 9.26 Closed and open zones of protection.
The zone of protection is bounded by the current transformers (CT) which provide the input to the relays. While a CT provides the ability to detect a fault within its zone, the circuit breaker (CB) provides the ability to isolate the fault by disconnecting all of the power equipment inside its zone. When a CT is part of the CB, it becomes a natural zone boundary. When the CT is not an integral part of the CB, special attention must be paid to the fault detection and fault interruption logic. The CTs still define the zone of protection, but a communication channel must be used to implement the tripping function.

C) RELAY SPEED

It is, of course, desirable to remove a fault from the power system as quickly as possible. However, the relay must make its decision based upon voltage and current waveforms, which are severely distorted due to transient phenomena that follow the occurrence of a fault. The relay must separate the meaningful and significant information contained in these waveforms upon which a secure relaying decision must be based. These considerations demand that the relay take a certain amount of time to arrive at a decision with the necessary degree of certainty. The relationship between the relay response time and its degree of certainty is an inverse one and is one of the most basic properties of all protection systems.

Although the operating time of relays often varies between wide limits, relays are generally classified by their speed of operation as follows:

1. INSTANTANEOUS: These relays operate as soon as a secure decision is made. No intentional time delay is introduced to slow down the relay response.

2. TIME-DELAY: An intentional time delay is inserted between the relay decision time and the initiation of the trip action.

3. HIGH-SPEED: A relay that operates in less than a specified time. The specified time in present practice is 50 milliseconds (3 cycles on a 60Hz system).

4.ULTRA HIGH-SPEED: This term is not included in the Relay Standards but is commonly considered to be operation in 4 milliseconds or less.

D) PRIMARY AND BACKUP PROTECTION

The main protection system for a given zone of protection is called the primary protection system. It operates in the fastest time possible and removes the least amount of equipment from service. On Extra High Voltage (EHV) systems, i.e., 345kV and above, it is common to use duplicate primary protection systems in case a component in one primary protection chain fails to operate. This duplication is therefore intended to cover the failure of the relays themselves. One may use relays from a different manufacturer, or relays based on a different principle of operation to avoid common-mode failures. The operating time and the tripping logic of both the primary and its duplicate system are the same.

It is not always practical to duplicate every element of the protection chain. On High Voltage (HV) and EHV systems, the costs of transducers and circuit breakers are very expensive and the cost of duplicate equipment may not be justified. On lower voltage systems, even the relays themselves may not be duplicated. In such situations, a backup set of relays will be used. Backup relays are slower than the primary relays and may remove more of the system elements than is necessary to clear the fault.

REMOTE BACKUP: These relays are located in a separate location and are completely independent of the relays, transducers, batteries, and circuit breakers that they are backing up. There are no common failures that can affect both sets of relays. However, complex system configurations may significantly affect the ability of a remote relay to “see” all faults for which backup is desired. In addition, remote backup may remove more sources of the system than can be allowed.

LOCAL BACKUP: These relays do not suffer from the same difficulties as remote backup, but they are installed in the same substation and use some of the same elements as the primary protection. They may then fail to operate for the same reasons as the primary protection.

E) RECLOSING

Automatic reclosing infers no manual intervention but probably requires specific interlocking such as a full or check synchronizing, voltage or switching device checks, or other safety or operating constraints.

Automatic reclosing can be high speed or delayed. High Speed Reclosing (HSR) allows only enough time for the arc products of a fault to dissipate; generally 15–40 cycles on a 60 Hz base, whereas time delayed re-closings have a specific coordinating time, usually 1 or more seconds. HSR has the possibility of generator shaft torque damage and should be closely examined before applying it.

It is common practice in the U.S. to trip all three phases for all faults and then reclose the three phases simultaneously. In Europe, however, for single line-to-ground faults, it is not uncommon to trip only the faulted phase and then reclose that phase. This practice has some applications in the U.S., but only in rare situations. When one phase of a three-phase system is opened in response to a single phase-to-ground fault, the voltage and current in the two healthy phases tend to maintain the fault arc after the faulted phase is de-energized. Depending on the length of the line, load current, and operating voltage, compensating reactors may be required to extinguish this “secondary arc.”

F) SYSTEM CONFIGURATION

Although the fundamentals of transmission line protection apply in almost all system configurations, there are different applications that are more or less dependent upon specific situations.

OPERATING VOLTAGES: Transmission lines will be those lines operating at 138 kV and above, sub-transmission lines are 34.5 kV to 138 kV, and distribution lines are below 34.5 kV. These are not rigid definitions and are only used to generically identify a transmission system and connote the type of protection usually provided. The higher voltage systems would normally be expected to have more complex, hence more expensive, relay systems. This is so because higher voltages have more expensive equipment associated with them and one would expect that this voltage class is more important to the security of the power system. The higher relay costs, therefore, are more easily justified.

LINE LENGTH: The length of a line has a direct effect on the type of protection, the relays applied, and the settings. It is helpful to categorize the line length as “short,” “medium,” or “long” as this helps establish the general relaying applications although the definition of “short,” “medium,” and “long” is not precise. A short line is one in which the ratio of the source to the line impedance (SIR) is large (>4 e.g.), the SIR of a long line is 0.5 or less and a medium line’s SIR is between 4 and 0.5. It must be noted, however, that the per-unit impedance of a line varies more with the nominal voltage of the line than with its physical length or impedance. So a “short” line at one voltage level may be a “medium” or “long” line at another.

MULTI-TERMINAL LINES: Occasionally, transmission lines may be tapped to provide intermediate connections to additional sources without the expense of a circuit breaker or other switching device.

Such a configuration is known as a multi-terminal line and, although it is an inexpensive measure for strengthening the power system, it presents special problems for the protection engineer. The difficulty arises from the fact that a relay receives its input from the local transducers, i.e., the current and voltage at the relay location. Referring to Fig. 9.27, the current contribution to a fault from the intermediate source is not monitored. The total fault current is the sum of the local current plus the contribution from the intermediate source, and the voltage at the relay location is the sum of the two voltage drops, one of which is the product of the unmonitored current and the associated line impedance.

FIGURE 9.27 Effect of infeed on local relays.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

TRANSMISSION LINE PROTECTION

The study of transmission line protection presents many fundamental relaying considerations that apply, in one degree or another, to the protection of other types of power system protection. Each electrical element, of course, will have problems unique to itself, but the concepts of reliability, selectivity, local and remote backup, zones of protection, coordination and speed which may be present in the protection of one or more other electrical apparatus are all present in the considerations surrounding transmission line protection.

Since transmission lines are also the links to adjacent lines or connected equipment, transmission line protection must be compatible with the protection of all of these other elements. This requires coordination of settings, operating times and characteristics.

The purpose of power system protection is to detect faults or abnormal operating conditions and to initiate corrective action. Relays must be able to evaluate a wide variety of parameters to establish that corrective action is required. Obviously, a relay cannot prevent the fault. Its primary purpose is to detect the fault and take the necessary action to minimize the damage to the equipment or to the system. The most common parameters which reflect the presence of a fault are the voltages and currents at the terminals of the protected apparatus or at the appropriate zone boundaries. The fundamental problem in power system protection is to define the quantities that can differentiate between normal and abnormal conditions. This problem is compounded by the fact that “normal” in the present sense means outside the zone of protection. This aspect, which is of the greatest significance in designing a secure relaying system, dominates the design of all protection systems.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

IMPACT OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR DIGITAL MULTIFUNCTION RELAYS

The latest technological leap in generator protection has been the release of digital multifunction relays by various manufacturers. With more sophisticated characteristics being available through software algorithms, generator protective function characteristics can be improved. Therefore, multifunction relays have many advantages, most of which stem from the technology on which they are based.

IMPROVEMENTS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING

Most multifunction relays use a full-cycle Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) algorithm for acquisition of the fundamental component of the current and voltage phasors. Consequently, they will benefit from the inherent filtering properties provided by the algorithms, such as:

• Immunity from DC component and good suppression of exponentially decaying offset due to the large value of X/R time constants in generators;

• Immunity to harmonics;

• Nominal response time of one cycle for the protective functions requiring fast response.

Since sequence quantities are computed mathematically from the voltage and current phasors, they will also benefit from the above advantages.

However, it should be kept in mind that fundamental phasors of waveforms are not the only parameters used in digital multifunction relays. Other parameters like peak or RMS values of waveforms can be equally acquired through simple algorithms, depending upon the characteristics of a particular algorithm.

A number of techniques have been used to make the measurement of phasor magnitudes independent of frequency, and therefore achieve stable sensitivities over large frequency excursions. One technique is known as frequency tracking and consists of having a number of samples in one cycle that is constant, regardless of the value of the frequency or the generator’s speed. A software digital phase-locked loop allows implementation of such a scheme and will inherently provide a direct measurement of the frequency or the speed of the generator. A second technique keeps the sampling period fixed, but varies the time length of the data window to follow the period of the generator frequency. This results in a variable number of samples in the cycles. A third technique consists of measuring the root-mean square value of a current or voltage waveform. The variation of this quantity with frequency is very limited, and therefore, this technique allows measurement of the magnitude of a waveform over a broad frequency range.

A further improvement consists of measuring the generator frequency digitally. Precision, in most cases, will be one hundredth of a hertz or better and good immunity to harmonics and noise is achievable with modern algorithms.

IMPROVEMENTS IN PROTECTIVE FUNCTIONS

The following functions will benefit from some inherent advantages of the digital processing capability:

• A number of improvements can be attributed to stator differential protection. The first is the detection of CT saturation in case of external faults that would cause the protection relay to trip.

When CT ratios do not match perfectly, the difference can be either automatically or manually introduced into the algorithm in order to suppress the difference.

• It is no longer necessary to provide a Δ-Y conversion for the backup 21 elements in order to cover the phase fault on the high side of the voltage transformer. That conversion can be accomplished mathematically inside the relay.

• In the area of detection of voltage transformer blown fuses, the use of symmetrical components allows identification of the faulted phase. Therefore, complex logic schemes can be implemented where only the protection function impacted by the phase will be blocked. As an example, if a 51V is implemented on all three phases independently, it will be sufficient to block the function only on the phase on which a fuse has been detected as blown. Furthermore, contrary to the conventional voltage balance relay scheme, a single VT will suffice when using this modern algorithm.

• Because of the different functions recording their characteristics over a large frequency interval, it is no longer necessary to monitor the frequency in order to implement start-up or shut-down protection.

• The 100% stator-ground protection can be improved by using third-harmonic voltage measurements both at the phase and neutral.

• The characteristic of an offset mho impedance relay in the R-X plane can be made to be independent of frequency by using one of the following two techniques: the frequency-tracking algorithm previously mentioned, or the use of the positive sequence voltage and current because their ratio is frequency-independent.

• Functions which are inherently three-phase phenomena can be implemented by using the positive sequence voltage and current quantities. The loss-of-field or loss-of-synchronism are examples.

• In the reverse power protection, improved accuracy and sensitivity can be obtained with digital technology.

• Digital technology allows the possibility of tailoring inverse volt/hertz curves to the user’s needs.

Full programmability of these same curves is readily achievable. From that perspective, volt/hertz protection is improved by a closer match between the implemented curve and the generator or step-up transformer damage curve.

Multifunction generator protection packages have other functions that make use of the inherent capabilities of microprocessor devices. These include: oscillography and event recording, time synchronization, multiple settings, metering, communications, self-monitoring, and diagnostics.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR TRIPPING PRINCIPLES

A number of methods for isolating a generator once a fault has been detected are commonly being implemented. They fall into four groups:

• Simultaneous tripping involves simultaneously shutting the prime mover down by closing its valves and opening the field and generator breakers. This technique is highly recommended for severe internal generator faults.

• Generator tripping involves simultaneously opening both the field and generator breakers.

• Unit separation involves opening the generator breaker only.

• Sequential tripping is applicable to steam turbines and involves first tripping the turbine valves in order to prevent any over-speeding of the unit. Then, the field and generator breakers are opened.

Figure 9.25 represents a possible logical scheme for the implementation of a sequential tripping function. If the following three conditions are met,

(1) The real power is below a negative pre-set threshold SET_1,

(2) The steam valve or a differential pressure switch is closed (either condition indicating the removal of the prime-mover),

(3) The sequential tripping function is enabled, and then a trip signal will be sent to the generator and field breakers.

FIGURE 9.25 Implementation of a sequential tripping function.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTAL ENERGIZATION

A number of catastrophic failures have occurred in the past when synchronous generators have been accidentally energized while at standstill. Among the causes for such incidents were human errors, breaker flashover, or control circuitry malfunction.

A number of protection schemes have been devised to protect the generator against inadvertent energization. The basic principle is to monitor the out-of-service condition and to detect an accidental energizing immediately following that state. As an example, Fig. 9.23 shows an application using an over-frequency relay supervising three single phase instantaneous overcurrent elements. When the generator is put out of service or the overfrequency element drops out, the timer will pick up. If inadvertent energizing occurs, the overfrequency element will pick up, but because of the timer dropout delay, the instantaneous overcurrent elements will have the time to initiate the generator breakers opening. The supervision could also be implemented using a voltage relay.

Accidental energizing caused by a single or three-phase breaker flashover occurring during the generator synchronizing process will not be detected by the logic of Fig. 9.23. In such an instance, by the time the generator has been closed to the synchronous speed, the overcurrent element outputs would have been blocked.

FIGURE 9.23 Frequency supervised overcurrent inadvertent energizing protection.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

PROTECTION OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS

In an apparatus protection perspective, generators constitute a special class of power network equipment because faults are very rare but can be highly destructive and therefore very costly when they occur. If for most utilities, generation integrity must be preserved by avoiding erroneous tripping, removing a generator in case of a serious fault is also a primary if not an absolute requirement. Furthermore, protection has to be provided for out-of-range operation normally not found in other types of equipment such as overvoltage, over-excitation, limited frequency or speed range, etc.

It should be borne in mind that, similar to all protective schemes, there is to a certain extent a “philosophical approach” to generator protection and all utilities and all protective engineers do not have the same approach. For instance, some functions like over-excitation, backup impedance elements, loss-of- synchronism, and even protection against inadvertent energization may not be applied by some organizations and engineers. It should be said, however, that with the digital multifunction generator protective packages presently available, a complete and extensive range of functions exists within the same “relay”: and economic reasons for not installing an additional protective element is a tendency which must disappear.

The nature of the prime mover will have some definite impact on the protective functions implemented into the system. For instance, little or no concern at all will emerge when dealing with the abnormal frequency operation of hydraulic generators. On the contrary, protection against under-frequency operation of steam turbines is a primary concern.

The sensitivity of the motoring protection (the capacity to measure very low levels of negative real power) becomes an issue when dealing with both hydro and steam turbines. Finally, the nature of the prime mover will have an impact on the generator tripping scheme. When delayed tripping has no detrimental effect on the generator, it is common practice to implement sequential tripping with steam turbines.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

TYPES OF TRANSFORMER FAULTS

Any numbers of conditions have been the reason for an electrical transformer failure. Statistics show that winding failures most frequently cause transformer faults (ANSI/IEEE, 1985). Insulation deterioration, often the result of moisture, overheating, vibration, voltage surges, and mechanical stress created during transformer through faults, is the major reason for winding failure.

Voltage regulating load tap changers, when supplied, rank as the second most likely cause of a transformer fault. Tap changer failures can be caused by a malfunction of the mechanical switching mechanism, high resistance load contacts, insulation tracking, overheating, or contamination of the insulating oil.

Transformer bushings are the third most likely cause of failure. General aging, contamination, cracking, internal moisture, and loss of oil can all cause a bushing to fail. Two other possible reasons are vandalism and animals that externally flash over the bushing.

Transformer core problems have been attributed to core insulation failure, an open ground strap, or shorted laminations.

Other miscellaneous failures have been caused by current transformers, oil leakage due to inadequate tank welds, oil contamination from metal particles, overloads, and overvoltage.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SHUNT REACTOR APPLICATIONS

Switching of shunt reactors (and other devices characterized as having small inductive currents such as transformer magnetizing currents, motor starting currents, etc.) can generate high phase-to-ground over-voltages as well as severe recovery voltages, especially on lower voltage equipment such as reactors applied on the tertiary of transformers. Energizing the devices seldom generates high overvoltages, but overvoltages generated during de-energizing, as a result of current chopping by the switching device when interrupting the small inductive currents, can be significant. Neglecting damping, the phase-to-ground overvoltage magnitude can be estimated by:
Where i is the magnitude of the chopped current (0 to perhaps as high as 10 A or more), L is the reactor’s inductance, and C is the capacitance of the reactor (on the order of a few thousand picofarads). When C is small, especially likely with dry-type reactors often used on transformer tertiaries, the surge impedance term can be large, and hence the overvoltage can be excessive.

To mitigate the over-voltages, surge arresters are sometimes useful, but the application of a capacitor on the terminals of the reactor (or other equipment) have a capacitance on the order of 0.25–0.5 μF is very helpful. In the equation above, note that if C is increased from pF to μF, the surge impedance term is dramatically reduced, and hence the voltage is reduced.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SERIES AND SHUNT CAPACITOR BANK APPLICATIONS

SERIES CAPACITOR BANK APPLICATIONS

Installation of a series capacitor bank in a transmission line (standard or thyristor controlled) has the potential for increasing the magnitude of phase-to-ground and phase-to-phase switching surge over-voltages due to the trapped charges that can be present on the bank at the instant of line reclosing. In general, surge arresters limit the phase-to-ground and phase-to-phase over-voltages to acceptable levels; however, one problem that can be serious is the recovery voltage experienced by circuit breakers when clearing faults on a series compensated line. Depending the bank’s characteristics and on fault location with respect to the bank’s location, a charge can be trapped on the bank, and this trapped charge can add to the surges already being generated during the fault clearing operation. The first circuit breaker to clear is sometimes exposed to excessive recovery voltages under such conditions.

FIGURE 10.25 Voltage magnification circuit.

SHUNT CAPACITOR BANK APPLICATIONS

Energizing a shunt capacitor bank typically results in maximum over-voltages of about 2 pu or less. However, there are two conditions where significant over-voltages can be generated. One involves a configuration (shown on Fig. 10.25) where two banks are separated by a significant inductance (e.g., a transformer). When one bank is switched, if the system inductance and bank 1 capacitance has the same natural frequency as that of the transformer leakage inductance and the bank 2 capacitance, then a voltage magnification can take place.

Another configuration that can result in damaging over-voltages involves energizing a capacitor bank with a transformer terminated transmission line radially fed from the substation at which the capacitor bank is located. During bank switching, phase-to-phase surges are imposed on the transformer, and because these are not very well suppressed by the usual phase-to-ground application of surge arresters, transformer failures have been known to result. Various methods to reduce the surge magnitude have included the application of controlled circuit breaker closing techniques (closing near voltage zero), and resistors or reactors pre-inserted in the closing sequence of the switching devices.

Re-striking of the switching device during bank de-energizing can result in severe line-to-ground over-voltages of 3 pu to 5 pu or more (rarely). Surge arresters are used to limit the voltages to acceptable levels, but at higher system voltages, the energy discharged from the bank into the arrester can exceed the arrester’s capability.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

TRANSMISSION LINE SWITCHING OPERATIONS

Surges associated with switching transmission lines (overhead, SF6, or cable) include those that are generated by line energizing, reclosing (three phase and single phase operations), fault initiation, line dropping (de-energizing), fault clearing, etc. During an energizing operation, for example, closing a circuit breaker at the instant of crest system voltage results in a 1 pu surge traveling down the transmission line and being reflected at the remote, open terminal. The reflection interacts with the incoming wave on the phase under consideration as well as with the traveling waves on adjacent phases. At the same time, the waves are being attenuated and modified by losses. Consequently, it is difficult to accurately predict the resultant wave-shapes without employing sophisticated simulation tools such as a transient network analyzer (TNA) or digital programs such as the Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP).

Transmission line over-voltages can also be influenced by the presence of other equipment connected to the transmission line; shunt reactors, series or shunt capacitors, static VAR systems, surge arresters, etc. These devices interact with the traveling waves on the line in ways that can either reduce or increase the severity of the over-voltages being generated.

When considering transmission line switching operations, it can be important to distinguish between “energizing” and “reclosing” operations, and the distinction is made on the basis of whether the line’s inherent capacitance retains a trapped charge at the time of line closing (reclosing operation) or whether no trapped charge exists (an energizing operation). The distinction is important as the magnitude of the switching surge overvoltage can be considerably higher when a trapped charge is present; with higher magnitudes, insulation is exposed to increased stress, and devices such as surge arresters will, by necessity, absorb more energy when limiting the higher magnitudes. Two forms of trapped charges can exist; DC and oscillating. A trapped charge on a line with no other equipment attached to the line exists as a DC trapped charge, and the charge can persist for some minutes before dissipating.

However, if a transformer (power or wound potential transformer) is connected to the line, the charge will decay rapidly (usually in less than 0.5 sec) by discharging through the saturating branch of the transformer. If a shunt reactor is connected to the line, the trapped charge takes on an oscillatory wave-shape due to the interaction between the line capacitance and the reactor inductance.

This form of trapped charge decays relatively rapidly depending on the Q of the reactor, with the charge being reduced by as much as 50% within 0.5 seconds.

FIGURE 10.21 DC trapped charge.

Figures 10.21 and 10.22 show the switching surges associated with reclosing a transmission line. In Fig. 10.21 note the DC trapped charge (approximately 1.0 pu) that exists prior to the reclosing operation (at 20 μs). Figure 10.22 shows the same case with an oscillating trapped charge (a shunt reactor was present on the line) prior to reclosing. Maximum surges were 3.0 for the DC trapped charge case and 2.75 pu for the oscillating trapped charge case (both occurred on phase c).

FIGURE 10.22 Oscillating trapped charge.

The power system configuration behind the switch or circuit breaker used to energize or reclose the transmission line also affects the over voltage characteristics (shape and magnitude) as the traveling wave interactions occurring at the junction of the transmission line and the system (i.e., at the circuit breaker) as well as reflections and interactions with equipment out in the system are important. In general, a stronger system (higher short circuit level) results in somewhat lower surge magnitudes than a weaker system, although there are exceptions. Consequently, when performing simulations to predict over-voltages, it is usually important to examine a variety of system configurations (e.g., a line out of service or contingencies) that might be possible and credible.

Single phase switching as well as three phase switching operations may also need to be considered. On EHV transmission lines, for example, most faults (approximately 90%) are single phase in nature, and opening and reclosing only the faulted phase rather than all three phases, reduces system stresses. Typically, the over-voltages associated with single phase switching have a lower magnitude than those that occur with three phase switching. Switching surge overvoltages produced by line switching are statistical in nature; that is, due to the way that circuit breaker poles randomly close (excluding specially modified switchgear designed to close on or near voltage zero), the instant of electrical closing may occur at the crest of the system voltage, at voltage zero, or somewhere in between. Consequently, the magnitude of the switching surge varies with each switching event. For a given system configuration and switching operation, the surge voltage magnitude at the open end of the transmission line might be 1.2 pu for one closing event and 2.8 pu for the next and this statistical variation can have a significantly impact on insulation design.

FIGURE 10.23 Phase-to-ground overvoltage distribution.

Typical switching surge overvoltage statistical distributions (160 km line, 100 random closings) are shown in Figs. 10.23 and 10.24 for phase-to-ground and phase-to-phase voltages and the surge magnitudes indicated are for the highest that occurred on any phase during each closing. With no surge limiting action (by arresters or circuit breaker pre-insertion resistors), phase-to-ground surges varied from 1.7 to 2.15 pu with phase-to-phase surges ranging from 2.2 to 3.7 pu. Phase-to-phase surges can be important to line-connected transformers and reactors as well as to transmission line phase-to-phase conductor separation distances when line-up-rating or compact line designs are being considered.

FIGURE 10.24 Phase-to-phase overvoltage distribution.

Figure 10.23 also demonstrates the effect of the application of surge arresters on phase-to-ground surges, and shows the application of resistors pre-inserted in the closing sequence of the circuit breaker (400 ohms for 5.56 ms) is even more effective than arresters in reducing surge magnitude. The results shown on Fig. 10.24, however, indicate that while resistors are effective in limiting phase-to-phase surges, arresters applied line to ground are generally not very effective at limiting phase-to-phase over-voltages.

Line dropping (de-energizing) and fault clearing operations also generate surges on the system, although these typically result in phase-to-ground over-voltages having a maximum value of 2 to 2.2 pu. Usually the concern with these operations is not with the phase-to-ground or phase-to-phase system voltages, but rather with the recovery voltage experienced by the switching device. The recovery voltage is the voltage which appears across the interrupting contacts of the switching device (a circuit breaker for example) following current extinction, and if this voltage has too high a magnitude, or in some instances rises to its maximum too quickly, the switching device may not be capable of successfully interrupting.

The occurrence of a fault on a transmission line also can result in switching surge type over-voltages, especially on parallel lines. These voltages usually have magnitudes on the order of 1.8–2.2 pu and are usually not a problem.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

SWITCHING SURGES

Switching surges occur on power systems as a result of instantaneous changes in the electrical configuration of the system, and such changes are mainly associated with switching operations and fault events.

These over-voltages generally have crest magnitudes which range from about 1 per unit to 3 pu for phase-to- ground surges and from about 2.0 to 4 pu for phase-to-phase surges (in pu on the phase to ground crest voltage base) with higher values sometimes encountered as a result of a system resonant condition. Wave-shapes vary considerably with rise times ranging from 50 μs to thousands of μs and times to half-value in the range of hundreds of μs to thousands of μs. For insulation testing purposes, a wave-shape having a time to crest of 250 μs with a time to half-value of 2000 μs is often used.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

OVERVOLTAGES CAUSED BY INDIRECT LIGHTNING STROKES

A direct stroke is defined as a lightning stroke when it hits either a shield wire, tower, or a phase conductor. An insulator string is stressed by very high voltages caused by a direct stroke. An insulator string can also be stressed by high transient voltages when a lightning stroke hits the nearby ground. An indirect stroke is illustrated in Fig. 10.12.

FIGURE 10.12 Illustration of direct and indirect lightning strokes.

The voltage induced on a line by an indirect lightning stroke has four components:

1. The charged cloud above the line induces bound charges on the line while the line itself is held electro-statically at ground potential by the neutrals of connected transformers and by leakage over the insulators. When the cloud is partially or fully discharged, these bound charges are released and travel in both directions on the line giving rise to the traveling voltage and current waves.

2. The charges lowered by the stepped leader further induce charges on the line. When the stepped leader is neutralized by the return stroke, the bound charges on the line are released and thus produce traveling waves similar to that caused by the cloud discharge.

3. The residual charges in the return stroke induce an electrostatic field in the vicinity of the line and hence an induced voltage on it.

4. The rate of change of current in the return stroke produces a magnetically induced voltage on the line.

If the lightning has subsequent strokes, then the subsequent components of the induced voltage will be similar to one or the other of the four components discussed above.

The magnitudes of the voltages induced by the release of the charges bound either by the cloud or by the stepped leader are small compared with the voltages induced by the return stroke. Therefore, only the electrostatic and the magnetic components induced by the return stroke are considered in the following analysis. The initial computations are performed with the assumption that the charge distribution along the leader stroke is uniform, and that the return-stroke current is rectangular. However, the result with the rectangular current wave can be transformed to that with currents of any other wave-shape by the convolution integral (Duhamel’s theorem). It was also assumed that the stroke is vertical and that the overhead line is loss-free and the earth is perfectly conducting. The vertical channel of the return stroke is shown in Fig. 10.13, where the upper part consists of a column of residual charge which is neutralized by the rapid upward movement of the return-stroke current in the lower part of the channel.

FIGURE 10.13 Return stroke with the residual charge column.
Figure 10.14 shows a rectangular system of coordinates where the origin of the system is the point where lightning strikes the surface of the earth. The line conductor is located at a distance yo meters from the origin, having a mean height of hp meters above ground and running along the x-direction. The origin of time (t = 0) is assumed to be the instant when the return stroke starts at the earth level.

FIGURE 10.14 Coordinate system of line conductor and lightning stroke.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

EFFECTS OF VERY FAST TRANSIENTS ON EQUIPMENTS

The level reached by VFT overvoltages originated by disconnector switching or line-to-ground faults inside a GIS is below the BIL of substation and external equipment. However, aging of the insulation of external equipment due to frequent VFT must be considered. TEV is a low energy phenomenon and it is not considered dangerous to humans; the main concern is in the danger of the surprise-shock effect. External transients can cause interference with or even damage to the substation control, protection, and other secondary equipment. The main effects caused by VFT to equipment and the techniques that can be used to mitigate these effects are summarized below.

FIGURE 10.33 Measurement and simulation of overvoltages in a 420 kV GIS at closing a switch. (Copyright 1999

SF6 INSULATION: Breakdown caused by VFT overvoltages is improbable in a well-designed GIS insulation system during normal operations. The breakdown probability increases with the frequency of the oscillations. In addition, breakdown values can be reduced by insulation irregularities like edges and fissures. However, at ultra high voltage systems, more than 1000 kV, for which the ratio of BIL to the system voltage is lower, breakdown is more likely to be caused. At these levels, VFT over-voltages can be reduced by using resistor-fitted dis-connectors.

TRANSFORMERS: Due to steep fronted wave impulses, direct connected transformers can experience an extremely nonlinear voltage distribution along the high-voltage winding, connected to the oil-SF6 bushings, and high resonance voltages due to transient oscillations generated within the GIS. Transformers can generally withstand these stresses; however, in critical cases, it may be necessary to install Varistors to protect tap changers.

DISCONNECTORS AND BREAKERS: The insulation system of breakers and switches is not endangered by VFT overvoltages generated in adjacent GIS equipment. Ground faults induced by VFT over-voltages have been observed in dis-connectors operations, as residual leader branches can be activated by enhanced field gradient to ground. These faults can be avoided by a proper dis-connector design.

ENCLOSURE: TEV can cause sparking across insulated flanges and to insulate busbars of CTs, and can puncture insulation that is intended to limit the spread of circulating currents within the enclosure.

TEV can be minimized with a proper design and arrangement of substation masts, keeping ground leads as short and straight as possible in order to minimize the inductance, increasing the number of connections to ground, introducing shielding to prevent internally generated VFT from reaching the outside of the enclosure, and installing voltage limiting Varistors where spacers must be employed.

BUSHINGS: Very few problems have been reported with capacitively graded bushings. High impedances in the connection of the last graded layer to the enclosure should be avoided.

SECONDARY EQUIPMENT: TEV may interfere with secondary equipment or damage sensitive circuits by raising the housing potential if they are directly connected or via cable shields to GIS enclosure by emitting free radiation which may induce currents and voltages in adjacent equipment. Correct cable connection procedures may minimize interference. The coupling of radiated energy may be reduced by mounting control cables closely along the enclosure supports and other grounded structures, grounding cable shields at both ends by leads as short as possible, or using optical coupling services. Voltage limiting devices may have to be installed.
Read More

Saturday, June 07, 2014

Engr. Aneel Kumar

CURRENT ACTUATED RELAYS

A) FUSES

The most commonly used protective device in a distribution circuit is the fuse. Fuse characteristics vary considerably from one manufacturer to another and the specifics must be obtained from their appropriate literature. Figure 9.28 shows the time-current characteristics which consist of the minimum melt and total clearing curves.

FIGURE 9.28 Fuse time-current characteristic.

Minimum melt is the time between initiation of a current large enough to cause the current responsive element to melt and the instant when arcing occurs. Total Clearing Time (TCT) is the total time elapsing from the beginning of an over-current to the final circuit interruption;

i.e., TCT = minimum melt plus arcing time.

In addition to the different melting curves, fuses have different load-carrying capabilities. Manufacturer’s application tables show three load-current values: continuous, hot-load pickup, and cold-load pickup. Continuous load is the maximum current that is expected for three hours or more for which the fuse will not be damaged. Hot-load is the amount that can be carried continuously, interrupted, and immediately reenergized without melting. Cold-load follows a 30-min outage and is the high current that is the result in the loss of diversity when service is restored. Since the fuse will also cool down during this period, the cold-load pickup and the hot-load pickup may approach similar values.

B) INVERSE-TIME DELAY OVER-CURRENT RELAYS

The principal application of time-delay over-current relays (TDOC) is on a radial system where they provide both phase and ground protection. A basic complement of relays would be two phase and one ground relay. This arrangement will protect the line for all combinations of phase and ground faults using the minimum number of relays. Adding a third phase relay, however, provides complete backup protection, that is two relays for every type of fault, and is the preferred practice. TDOC relays are usually used in industrial systems and on sub-transmission lines that cannot justify more expensive protection such as distance or pilot relays.

There are two settings that must be applied to all TDOC relays: the pickup and the time delay. The pickup setting is selected so that the relay will operate for all short circuits in the line section for which it is to provide protection. This will require margins above the maximum load current, usually twice the expected value, and below the minimum fault current, usually 1/3 the calculated phase-to-phase or phase-to-ground fault current. If possible, this setting should also provide backup for an adjacent line section or adjoining equipment. The time-delay function is an independent parameter that is obtained in a variety of ways, either the setting of an induction disk lever or an external timer. The purpose of the time-delay is to enable relays to coordinate with each other. Figure 9.29 shows the family of curves of a single TDOC model. The ordinate is time in milliseconds or seconds depending on the relay type; the abscissa is in multiples of pickup to normalize the curve for all fault current values. Figure 9.30 shows how TDOC relays on a radial line coordinate with each other.

FIGURE 9.29 Family of TDOC time-current characteristics.

FIGURE 9.30 Coordination of TDOC relays.

C) INSTANTANEOUS OVER-CURRENT RELAYS

Figure 9.30 also shows why the TDOC relay cannot be used without additional help. The closer the fault is to the source, the greater the fault current magnitude, yet the longer the tripping time. The addition of an instantaneous over-current relay makes this system of protection viable. If an instantaneous relay can be set to “see” almost up to, but not including, the next bus, all of the fault clearing times can be lowered as shown in Fig. 9.31. In order to properly apply the instantaneous over-current relay, there must be a substantial reduction in short-circuit current as the fault moves from the relay toward the far end of the line. However, there still must be enough of a difference in the fault current between the near and far end faults to allow a setting for the near end faults. This will prevent the relay from operating for faults beyond the end of the line and still provide high-speed protection for an appreciable portion of the line.


FIGURE 9.31 Effect of instantaneous relays.
Since the instantaneous relay must not see beyond its own line section, the values for which it must be set are very much higher than even emergency loads. It is common to set an instantaneous relay about 125–130% above the maximum value that the relay will see under normal operating situations and about 90% of the minimum value for which the relay should operate.

D) DIRECTIONAL OVER-CURRENT RELAYS

Directional over-current relaying is necessary for multiple source circuits when it is essential to limit tripping for faults in only one direction. If the same magnitude of fault current could flow in either direction at the relay location, coordination cannot be achieved with the relays in front of, and, for the same fault, the relays behind the non-directional relay, except in very unusual system configurations.

POLARIZING QUANTITIES: To achieve directionality, relays require two inputs; the operating current and a reference, or polarizing, quantity that does not change with fault location. For phase relays, the polarizing quantity is almost always the system voltage at the relay location. For ground directional indication, the zero-sequence voltage (3E0) can be used. The magnitude of 3E0 varies with the fault location and may not be adequate in some instances. An alternative and generally preferred method of obtaining a directional reference is to use the current in the neutral of a Wye-grounded/delta power transformer.

E) DISTANCE RELAYS

Distance relays respond to the voltage and current, i.e., the impedance, at the relay location. The impedance per mile is fairly constant so these relays respond to the distance between the relay location and the fault location. As the power systems become more complex and the fault current varies with changes in generation and system configuration, directional over-current relays become difficult to apply and to set for all contingencies, whereas the distance relay setting is constant for a wide variety of changes external to the protected line.

There are three general distance relay types as shown in Fig. 9.32. Each is distinguished by its application and its operating characteristic.

FIGURE 9.32 Distance relay characteristics.
a) IMPEDANCE RELAY

The impedance relay has a circular characteristic centered at the origin of the R-X diagram. It is non-directional and is used primarily as a fault detector.

b) ADMITTANCE RELAY

The admittance relay is the most commonly used distance relay. It is the tripping relay in pilot schemes and as the backup relay in step distance schemes. Its characteristic passes through the origin of the R-X diagram and is therefore directional. In the electromechanical design it is circular, and in the solid state design, it can be shaped to correspond to the transmission line impedance.

c) REACTANCE RELAY

The reactance relay is a straight-line characteristic that responds only to the reactance of the protected line. It is non-directional and is used to supplement the admittance relay as a tripping relay to make the overall protection independent of resistance. It is particularly useful on short lines where the fault arc resistance is the same order of magnitude as the line length.

Figure 9.33 shows a three-zone step distance relaying scheme that provides instantaneous protection over 80–90% of the protected line section (Zone 1) and time-delayed protection over the remainder of the line (Zone 2) plus backup protection over the adjacent line section. Zone 3 also provides backup protection for adjacent lines sections.

FIGURE 9.33 Three-zone step distance relaying to protect 100% of a line and backup the neighboring line.
In a three-phase power system, 10 types of faults are possible: three single phase-to-ground, three phase-to-phase, three double phase-to-ground, and one three-phase fault. It is essential that the relays provided have the same setting regardless of the type of fault. This is possible if the relays are connected to respond to delta voltages and currents. In general, for a multiphase fault between phases x and y,
In a three-phase power system, 10 types of faults are possible: three single phase-to-ground, three phase-to-phase, three double phase-to-ground, and one three-phase fault. It is essential that the relays provided have the same setting regardless of the type of fault. This is possible if the relays are connected to respond to delta voltages and currents. In general, for a multiphase fault between phases x and y,
Where m is a constant depending on the line impedances, and I0 is the zero sequence current in the transmission line. A full complement of relays consists of three phase distance relays and three ground distance relays. This is the preferred protective scheme for high voltage and extra high voltage systems.
Read More
Engr. Aneel Kumar

PILOT PROTECTION

As can be seen from Fig. 9.33, step distance protection does not offer instantaneous clearing of faults over 100% of the line segment. In most cases this is unacceptable due to system stability considerations.

To cover the 10–20% of the line not covered by Zone 1, the information regarding the location of the fault is transmitted from each terminal to the other terminal(s). A communication channel is used for this transmission. These pilot channels can be over power line carrier, microwave, fiber-optic, or wire pilot. Although the underlying principles are the same regardless of the pilot channel, there are specific design details that are imposed by this choice.

Power line carrier uses the protected line itself as the channel, superimposing a high frequency signal on top of the 60 Hz power frequency. Since the line being protected is also the medium used to actuate the protective devices, a blocking signal is used. This means that a trip will occur at both ends of the line unless a signal is received from the remote end.

FIGURE 9.33 Three-zone step distance relaying to protect 100% of a line and backup the neighboring line.

Microwave or fiber-optic channels are independent of the transmission line being protected so a tripping signal can be used.

Wire pilot channels are limited by the impedance of the copper wire and are used at lower voltages where the distance between the terminals is not great, usually less than 10 miles.

A) DIRECTIONAL COMPARISON

The most common pilot relaying scheme in the U.S. is the directional comparison blocking scheme, using power line carrier. The fundamental principle upon which this scheme is based utilizes the fact that, at a given terminal, the direction of a fault either forward or backward is easily determined by a directional relay. By transmitting this information to the remote end, and by applying appropriate logic, both ends can determine whether a fault is within the protected line or external to it. Since the power line itself is used as the communication medium, a blocking signal is used.

B) TRANSFER TRIPPING

If the communication channel is independent of the power line, a tripping scheme is a viable protection scheme. Using the same directional relay logic to determine the location of a fault, a tripping signal is sent to the remote end. To increase security, there are several variations possible. A direct tripping signal can be sent, or additional under-reaching or overreaching directional relays can be used to supervise the tripping function and increase security. An under-reaching relay sees less than 100% of the protected line, i.e., Zone 1. An overreaching relay sees beyond the protected line such as Zone 2 or 3.

C) PHASE COMPARISON

Phase comparison is a differential scheme that compares the phase angle between the currents at the ends of the line. If the currents are essentially in phase, there is no fault in the protected section. If these currents are essentially 180o out of phase, there is a fault within the line section. Any communication link can be used.

D) PILOT WIRE

Pilot wire relaying is a form of differential line protection similar to phase comparison, except that the phase currents are compared over a pair of metallic wires. The pilot channel is often a rented circuit from the local telephone company. However, as the telephone companies are replacing their wired facilities with microwave or fiber-optics, this protection must be closely monitored.
Read More